The Scientology Money Project

What the Church of Scientology Doesn’t Want the Public to Know – Part 1

The real secret about Scientology is not Xenu or volcanoes.

What the Church of Scientology does not want the public to know is its biggest secret: Scientologists consider that they are Homo Novis, a new and superior Master Race.

The real secret about Scientology is its Master Race agenda that seeks nothing less than world conquest via ethnic cleansing and taking over the political, legal, educational, and mental health systems of the world.

As we documented from the words of L. Ron Hubbard, the Church of Scientology is actually Master Race group that embodies a call for a genocide against 2.5% of the global population it blames for the world’s problems. These people must be destroyed because they stand in the way of Scientology’s secret goal of world conquest by deceiving and brainwashing the masses.

tom-cruise-actor.11Scientology celebrities Tom Cruise, Greta Van Susteren, Kirstie Alley, Anne Archer, and John Travolta know about the secret Scientology plans and are a willing part of them.

Scientologist and pharmaceutical billionaire Bob Duggan, CEO of publicly traded Pharmacyclics is part of the plan. Duggan, the richest Scientologist in the world, has donated over $50,000,000 to forward Scientology’s secret aims.

Scientology uses the chilling Orwellian codespeak term New Civilization to describe its fascist vision of a Scientology world. over by tyrannical Scientology dictator David Miscavige, Scientology’s secret quest for world domination and ethnic cleaning explains the Church of Scientology’s malicious, vindictive, and litigious behavior.

The covert quest for world domination explains why the Church of Scientology is operated by a secretive paramilitary group called the Sea Organization.

Shockingly, and unknown to the public, is that Scientology’s private paramilitary has about 4,000 members and a war chest of possibly four billion dollars. This blog has hard evidence of $1.7 billion in Scientology money.


 The Church of Scientology is infamously litigious and employs dozens of non-Scientology lawyers to do its bidding. The Church’s top lawyers are discussed in a Business Insider article.

The Church of Scientology’s non-Scientology lawyers had unlimited funds to spend fighting the IRS. This effort allowed the Church of Scientology to regain 501(c)(3) tax exemption in 1993; this after having lost tax exempt status in 1967.

Having gained status in America as a religion allowed the Church of Scientology to gain religious protections for its secret Master Race agenda.

As a result of tax exemption, the Church of Scientology has been able to:

* Get away with at least two murders.

* Cover up rape, child molestation, and violent assaults on women.

* Spend tax-free dollars to perpetrate acts of retaliation and violence against those who speak out against Scientology; this under Scientology’s notorious policy of revenge called Fair Game.

* Spend tens of millions of tax-free dollars to defend David Miscavige from the consequences of his own malignant orders to destroy former Church executive Mark Rathbun for daring to speak out. The Church of Scientology is paying twenty-two lawyers to fight in the Rathbun case in Texas.

* Financially rape and destroy its own members in the name of “religious donations.”

* Kidnap and hold its own members against their will by use of unconscionable and malicious contracts.

* Break up families, marriages, and friendships by a “religious policy” called Disconnection.

* Engage in human trafficking.

* Engage in an endless series of nonstop lies about Scientology’s actual malicious ideology and plans.

* Operate a highly-profitable Mafia-like criminal syndicate while calling it a religion.


While it would seem — based purely on principle — that Jewish lawyers would refuse to use their talents in the employ of a Master Race cult, it is nevertheless true that several Jewish lawyers aid and assist the Church of Scientology in its disturbing and malicious plans for world domination:

1. David J. Schindler of Latham & Watkins LLP.

2. Bert Deixler of Kendall Brill Klieger.

3.  Eric M. Lieberman of Rabinowitz, Boudin, Standard, Krinsky & Lieberman, P.C.

UPDATE: The reason that the Jewishness of these particular lawyers is relevant is because they belong to Jewish human rights groups, or in the case of Lieberman, advocate for civil rights while working for the Church of Scientology — an organization that strips both Sea Org members and public members of their basic human rights and civil rights. The same question equally applies to Christian, Islamic, and all other attorneys who are members of faith communities and represent the Church of Scientology. How can such attorneys spiritually reconcile the inhumanity, greed, and deceitfulness of the Church of Scientology to their faith or support of human rights? As documented, the Church uses four unconscionable contracts to strip Scientologists of many of their civil rights.

1. David J. Schindler, Board Member, Bet Tzedek “Justice For All.” How can Schindler reconcile his personal belief that there should be “justice for all” when there is no justice for Scientologists both in their own Church and when they leave their Church? Schindler was the lawyer who sent threat letters to the parents of many Anons.

2. Bert Deixler’s official Kendall, Brill, Klieger bio states, “His community activities include Board Membership of the Western Justice Center Foundation (Executive Committee).” On its mission statement page, The Western Justice Center states its mission:

Western Justice Center is a non-profit organization dedicated to building a more civil, peaceful society where differences are valued.

We design and implement creative programs that change the way people think about and respond to differences and conflict. Our programs raise awareness, build skills and increase the possibility of just communities and schools.

How does Deixler reconcile his personal commitment “to building a more civil, peaceful society where differences are valued” when he works for a Master Race group that wants to negate the democratic and civil rights basis of Western Civilization? L. Ron Hubbard himself did not want Democracy. He wanted to rule a Scientology world in which he was the dictator and only Clears and above had the right to vote on anything. Scientologists have never been allowed to vote on anything in the Church.

3. Eric Lieberman’s page at LinkedIn states;

Mr. Lieberman served for many years as Co-General Counsel for the National Emergency Civil Liberties Committee, an organization that litigated many important civil rights and liberties cases. Mr. Lieberman, is also Co-General Counsel for the Bill of Rights Foundation, a similar organization. Mr. Lieberman served as Chairman of the Subcommittee on Civil Rights and Criminal Procedure of the Committee on State Legislation, New York County Lawyers Association.

How does Eric Lieberman reconcile his work of civil liberties and free speech with his decades-long representation of the Church of Scientology? Scientology is a fascist system whose members have virtually no rights. Lieberman himself has said that his firm represents “controversial clients.” The Key Wiki page shows that Lieberman’s firm has represented dictators:

The Firm (Rabinowitz, Boudin, Standard, Krinsky & Lieberman, P.C.) represents the Republic of Cuba, and its agencies and enterprises, in all matters pertaining to the United States. The Firm has been Cuba’s only counsel in the United States since June 1960. The Firm has also represented:[2]

  • Republic of South Africa, in several current U.S. judicial proceedings

  • Central Bank of Iran (Bank Markazi Iran) during the Iran-U.S. confrontation of 1979-81

  • Prime Minister Andreas Papandreou and the Government of the Hellenic Republic (Greece)

  • Republic of Haiti and President Jean-Bertrand Aristide

  • Republic of Chile, CORFO (Chilean state development corporation) and CODELCO (Chilean state copper company) during the presidency of Salvador Allende

  • Nicaraguan state enterprises and Nicaragua’s Permanent Mission to the U.N. during the Sandinista period

  • The Angolan state airline, TAAG, and Angola’s Permanent Mission to the United Nations

  • Officials of the PLO’s Permanent Observer Mission to the United Nations in contesting the U.S. efforts to close the Mission

How does Lieberman reconcile his civil rights work with representing dictators, dictatorships, and the Church of Scientology? Is it as simple as saying that Scientology can buy all the lawyers it wants with its tax-exempt dollars to pay for its decades of never-ending legal problems? Is the actual purpose of the Church of Scientology to endlessly raise money to employ as many lawyers as necessary to defend the church’s atrocious conduct? Is Scientology ultimately, and only, nothing more than a series of shabby contracts that promise intangible spiritual benefits and imaginary statuses in exchange for nonrefundable monies? If so, Scientology ultimately never escapes the wheel of birth and death  — and never really changes any conditions whatsoever. Perhaps I am naive, but given the evil inherent in the Church of Scientology, I personally don’t understand why any lawyer with stated commitments to faith, human rights, and civil liberties would work for the Church of Scientology, but it gets worse.


The Church of Scientology’s Jewish lawyers are not only working for a Master Race group; they are  also, ironically, working on behalf the anti-Semitic Nation of Islam.

The Church of Scientology and the Nation of Islam are in an alliance to Clear the Planet, where “Clear the Planet” is just another Scientology codeword for ethnic cleansing.

Minister Louis Farrakhan’s annual Saviours’ Day address for 2015 will be televised in the Church of Scientology London located at 146 Queen Victoria Street in London (see the Nation of Islam flier below).

In his past Saviours’ Day addresses, Farrakhan has sharply attacked the Jews, attacked Israel, and questioned the veracity of the Holocaust.  Farrakhan also refused to speak out against Islamic terrorists:

“You expect Muslims to stand against suicide bombers. You expect us to say, ‘wait a minute, you do not kill innocent people for political purposes.’ You want us to say that and if we don’t say it you rise up against us. But we don’t hear you correcting your brothers because what they’re doing is creating hatred for Israel and hatred for America that looks the other way while the Palestinians are being slaughtered.”op. cit.


Where does it end?

What else does the Church of Scientology not want the public to know?

Stay tuned for Part II of this series.

14 replies »

  1. Jeffrey,

    “The Church of Scientology’s Jewish lawyers are not only working for a Master Race group; they are also, essentially, working on behalf the anti-Semitic Nation of Islam.”

    To unite Scientology’s apparatus for mind control and PSYOPS with NOI messianic goals. Wow, wow, wow!

    What could possibly go wrong with that?

  2. Jeffrey, it is true that the final goal of the totalitarian cula of greed is to take over the whole of society on planet Earth and subsequently in the whole Universe. The only goal of “ethics” is to eliminate any other intention any other way of thinking. Any body opposing Scientology is per se a “suppressive person” or a psychopath therefore per Scientology doctrine anyone opposing Its world domination plan should be disposed of quietly and without sorrow. But I don’t think it is ethnic cleansing. It is more based on ideas than on race. It is more the Alpha spirits that have Scientology tech and should master the world and get compliance from stupid wogs and homo saps and anyone who gets in the way should be destroyed and eliminated by any means. The cult of greed is incompatible with democracy and with human rights. It is just a commercial meat grinder that destroyed lives as an “ecclesiastical ritual”. But in the end the truth shall prevail and Hubbard will be know for what he really was, the most succesful swindler of the 20th century and a total failure who failed as a student, husband, father, Navy officer, friend and human being and who died in hiding, alone, half mad, with his pancreas in shreds and The close guard and his doctor waiting for his death so that the IRS settlement could take place.

  3. Jeffrey, I’m embarrassed and ashamed for you for publishing this rant. I was a member of the C of S for over 40 years and never once considered myself a member of a master race, nor did anyone else I knew. Also you are grossly inaccurate in calling a supposed plan for eliminating “SPs” ethnic cleansing since it clearly has nothing to do with ethnic identity. This article bears quite a bit of resemblance to the claims by anti-Semites that the Jews are trying to take over the world and that resemblance is increased by your singling out Jewish lawyers for special mention. While it is true that LRH — I believe it was in “Science of Survival” — suggested that the world would be better off without 2.5% of the population, you have certainly ignored many, many things LRH wrote showing a sincere desire to help all his fellow human beings while fixating on this one thing. You haven’t drawn any distinction between the whole body of work produced by Ron Hubbard and the squirrelly and suppressive acts of David Miscavige – for example the alliance with Farrakhan, the changes in the tech, the ideal org strategy and endless fundraising. Yes, LRH was no saint and could be justly criticized for many things but don’t blame him for everything that has happened in the C of S since he passed away. I am sure most of the readers of this blog are delighted with your attack and that I will be condemned for daring to suggest there was some good in LRH and that the C of S did have some goals to genuinely help people. Well, tough.

  4. I agree. I also find it very funny and ironic that they are teaming up with Islam, they’re going to make a fine, fine enemy for themselves once nation of islam wises up, it goes like this

    1 noi gets sucked dry of any money they have
    2 they find out what Hubbard says about muhammad
    3 they decides to leave and publicly denounce scientology
    4 they become targeted by osa and their confessions are handed to the press to stop their bad pr, the money they donated is used against themselves to hire pi’s to chase them around and harass them, or for lawyers to leach them dry in frivolous court cases

    scientology creates it’s own enemies, I think they get bored being so rich and successful or something, of all people to try to bring into their fold, the nation of islam, they probably are thinking that they have found a group to agree and assist them in their genocide but I think it will backfire, another footbullet!

    You can read and hear audio here:

    These three quotes occur in succession in Whats Wrong with this Universe: A Working Package for the Auditor, L. Ron Hubbard, 9 Dec 1952. Real Audio [114KB] .wav[560KB]
    Hubbard on the Lodestone

    “..finds this enormous stone hanging suspended in the middle of a room. This is an incident called the Emanator by the way. …and this thing is by the way the source of the Mohammedan Lodestone that they have hanging down there,…”

    Hubbard asserts that the stone at Mecca is an artifact of an incident [implant or false memory]. This is consistent with other incidents found in Scientology, for example R6 (zenu) which is the basis of Christianity.

    Hubbard on Mohammed

    “…that, eh, when Mohammed decided to be a good small-town booster in ah Kansas, Middle-East, or something of the sort.”


    Kansas is a large, flat, semi-arid, sparsely populated state roughly in the center of North America. In this context, Kansas is disparaged as a cultural backwater, seemingly unworthy of notice. By extension, “Kansas, Middle-East” (at least in the United States) characterizes Mohammed as a local personality in an insignificant corner of the world. Hubbard showed disrespect for the founders of nearly all major world religions, so this gratuitous snub is not unexpected.
    Hubbard gratuitously insults Mohammed and Islam in stating that Mohammed began his ministry as “a good small-town booster [advocate]”.
    Hubbard on Mohammed’s Motives

    “By the way, the only reason he mocked that thing up, is the trade wasn’t good in his hometown. That’s right. You read the life of Mohammed.”

    Mohammed (Salla Allah Alieh wa salaam) did not mock Islam up for the reason of trade. He comes from one of the wealthiest families in Arabia. He was offered the wealth of his family in exchange for not teaching Islam, but refused.
    As documented in Islamic books, Mohammed taught “Zuhud”, an Arabic word which means to denounce all the material things in life and turn towards God “Allah”. Even though Mohammed was married to the wealthiest woman in Arabia, he lived the life of the poor, never slept on a cushion, had old and patched clothes, and never complained. Mohammed taught Mulsims to be humble, to respect the elders and be kind to the young.
    Mecca was the pilgrimage place for many of the people at that time and the pilgrimage time then and now is a very good business time so there is and was no reason to mock anything up for business.
    “mockup” refers to the Scientology concept of thetans’ ability to fabricate something simply by willing it into being. Used in context, Genesis 1:1 reads, “…In the beginning, God mocked up the heavens and the earth.”
    Hubbard gratuitously insults Mohammed (again) by stating that Islam was created in response to business, rather than spiritual motivation. Given Scientology’s tendency to over-emphasize monetary gain, Hubbard is the pot calling the kettle black.
    Hubbard on the Casbah [sic]

    “And he’s got a black one and it sort of hung between the ceiling and the floor, I don’t know, maybe they call it ‘Casbah’ or something … Anyway, anyway, that thing is a mockup of the Emanator!”

    Hubbard shows contempt for Islam by using the incorrect word for the ka’abah, a cubical building in the mosque at Mecca which houses a black stone, believed to be a fragment of Abraham’s altar.
    Given the ethnic stereotypes portrayed in 1950s movies such as Casablanca, Hubbard’s use of “the Casbah”[sic] is very nearly an ethnic slur. “The Casbah”, a poor district of Cairo(?), invokes images of corruption and intrigue, and was sadly one of the few images that Americans had of Middle Eastern culture during the 1950s.
    Hubbard on the Roots of Islam

    “The Emanator is bright, not black. And so, your volunteer, who insists on a sightseeing trip, goes in and this thing is standing in the middle of the room, and it’s going ‘wong wong wong wong wong’ and he says: “Isn’t that pretty?”. It sure is, and then he says “Mmmgrmrm ponk” Why, I’ll tell you, they cart him from there, and they take him in and they do a transposition of beingness.”

    Hubbard claims that in a previous life, people were hypnotized by the Emanator and had a “transposition of beingness” [an implant or false memory]. Mohammed, who had this implant from a previous life, vaguely remembered the Emanator prior to “mocking up” Islam. This is similar to Hubbard’s explanation for the origins of Christianity – “through watching the dramatizations of people, picked up some little fragments of R6.”
    Hubbard shows further contempt for Islam by describing a religious pilgrimage to Mecca as “a sightseeing trip”.
    Miscavige on Religions of the Last 2000 Years

    “For while you’ve often heard it said ‘we are the only major religion to emerge in this 20th century,’ the truth is more than that. In fact, we are the only new religion. Not a reinterpretation of some ancient doctrine, but the only original scriptural voice in the last 2,000 years.”, International Scientology News #7, David Miscavige [ecclesiastical leader], March 13, 1998

    Apparently, Miscavige views Islam as just a “reinterpretation” of ancient doctrine and not an original scriptural voice.

  5. Jesus, where did that come from?Having been involved in Scn since 1969 until 2004 and studied more than most people through working in RTRC for 13 years, I never, ever, saw anything that even hinted at what you are alleging.

  6. alexdevalera, I considered the term “ethnic cleansing” in terms of the definition given at Wikipedia:

    “Ethnic cleansing is the systematic forced removal of ethnic or religious groups from a given territory with the intent of making it ethnically or religiously homogeneous. The forces applied may be various forms of forced migration (deportation, population transfer), intimidation, as well as mass murder.”

    Hubbard stated that Scientology was a religion and that the purpose of the Sea Org was to put in Scientology Ethics on the planet. This statement embodies Hubbard and the Sea Org’s goal of seeking ethnic (homo novis) and religious (Scientology) homogeneity on Planet Earth.

    Hubbard proposed three Scientology solutions that meet the definition of ethic cleansing:

    1. Forced conversion to Scientology, i.e. being audited to 2.0 or above. The false choice of forced conversion, exile, or death is typical of terroristic regimes throughout history.

    2. Quarantine (forced deportation or population transfer to an area of confinement, i.e. a series of prison camps administered by the Sea Org.

    3. Genocide: Hubbard used the following language to speak of those 2.0 and below:

    A. “dispose of them quietly and without sorrow”

    B. “The sudden and abrupt deletion of all individuals occupying the lower bands of the tone scale from the social order would result in an almost instant rise in the cultural tone and would interrupt the dwindling spiral into which any society may have entered. It is not necessary to produce a world of clears in order to have a reasonable and worthwhile social order; it is only necessary to delete those individuals who range from 2.0 down, either by processing them enough to get their tone level above the 2.0 line”

    C. “Venezuelan dictator once decided to stop leprosy. He saw that most lepers in his country were also beggars. By the simple expedient of collecting and destroying all the beggars in Venezuela an end was put to leprosy in that country”

    If any Scientologist would like to explain what Hubbard meant please do.

  7. JenniS, Homo Novis is a racial and Master Race identification Hubbard created:

    “HOMO NOVIS, 1. Homo man, novis, new. (BCR, p. 12) 2. a theta-animated mest body possessed of new and desirable attributes; a mest clear, a good, sane rational mest being about a skyscraper higher than Homo sapiens. (HOM, p. 40) 3. the Second Stage Release is definitely Homo novis. The person ceases to respond like Homo sapiens and has fantastic capability to learn and act. (HCOB 28 Jun 65)”
    — L. Ron Hubbard, Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary

    If you are offended with anyone it should be with L. Ron Hubbard for it was he who said Scientologists were a superior race whose goal was to control the planet.

    I am simply reporting on what Hubbard wrote about Homo Novis and genocide. It is all there in Scientology scripture because Hubbard put it there and never cancelled it or removed it.

    It is up to the Church of Scientology to explain what Hubbard wrote. Yet, the Church has never chosen to issue a statement on Hubbard’s comments in Science of Survival. The Church’s silence signals assent — as does the fact that the Church did not remove Hubbard’s call for genocide from the 2007 Basics edition of Science of Survival.

    Scientologists have long used the epithets “wogs” and “homo saps” to speak derisively of all non-Scientologists. The term “homo saps” is absolutely a racial slur: Not only are homo saps deemed inferior to Scientologists; they are also saps, a pejorative term meaning idiots.

    L. Ron Hubbard wrote that Homo Novis was racially superior to the race of Homo Sapiens. That is part of the Church of Scientology’s scriptures and to deny it would be a violation of KSW to deny it. Church of Scientology members are saddled with everything LRH wrote; people who leave the Church are not.

    L. Ron Hubbard wrote:

    “The reasonable man quite ordinarily overlooks the fact that people from 2.0 down have no traffic with reason and cannot be reasoned with as one would reason with a 3.0. There are only two answers for the handling of people from 2.0 down on the tone scale , neither one of which has anything to do with reasoning with them or listening to their justification of their acts. The first is to raise them on the tone scale by un-enturbulating some of their theta by any one of the three valid processes . The other is to dispose of them quietly and without sorrow. Adders are safe bedmates compared to people on the lower bands of the tone scale. Not all the beauty nor the handsomeness nor artificial social value nor property can atone for the vicious damage such people do to sane men and women. The sudden and abrupt deletion of all individuals occupying the lower bands of the tone scale from the social order would result in an almost instant rise in the cultural tone and would interrupt the dwindling spiral into which any society may have entered. It is not necessary to produce a world of clears in order to have a reasonable and worthwhile social order; it is only necessary to delete those individuals who range from 2.0 down, either by processing them enough to get their tone level above the 2.0 line — a task which, indeed, is not very great, since the amount of processing in many cases might be under fifty hours, although it might also in others be in excess of two hundred — or simply quarantining them from the society. A Venezuelan dictator once decided to stop leprosy. He saw that most lepers in his country were also beggars. By the simple expedient of collecting and destroying all the beggars in Venezuela an end was put to leprosy in that country” — Science of Survival: Prediction of Human Behavior by L. Ron Hubbard

    JenniS, please explain what is meant by “Planetary Clearing” relative to Mr. Hubbard’s quotes above.

    Please explain what is meant by “confronting and shattering suppression” relative to the Hubbard quotes above.

    Please explain why Hubbard wrote that Scientologists were a superior race to “homo saps.”

  8. Dan, to answer your question “where did that come from?” the answer is of course that it came from L. Ron Hubbard.

    I’m glad you posted here because I’ve always wanted to ask someone who was there at your level in RTRC this particular question: L. Ron Hubbard’s call for genocide of all persons <2.0 is contained in Science of Survival. When the Basics were announced, I wondered if the Church had quietly expunged Hubbard's call for genocide in SOS and put that part of Hubbard behind it.

    I purchased the new 2007 edition of SOS only to find that Hubbard's call for genocide was still there. Why? Why did David Miscavige not delete Hubbard's call for genocide? The only possible answer is that it was Church scripture and it stayed. Thus,Hubbard's call for genocide remains a part of Church scripture.

    The goal of the Church of Scientology is to build a New Civilization ruled by Scientologists. To that end. The purpose of the Sea Org is to get in Scientology Ethics on the Planet. Thus, Hubbard wrote his Fair Game policy and Fair Game is operational. OSA runs Fair Game on SP's — former members and critics — to the greatest extent possible. We saw Fair Game in action with the recent attacks on Alex Gibney, HBO, and former Church members.

    Fair Game is alive and well. And while the Church of Scientology lacks the means to fully enforce its Master Race policies of genocide, disconnection, Fair Game, spying,and human rights abuses this lack of means does not lessen Scientology’s stated intent to make these policies the law.

    Hubbard's call for genocide against persons >2.0 remains in Science of Survival and is therefore part of Church scripture along with Fair Game, disconnection, auditing, regging, and everything else. Everything good and bad is all there.

    Per Hubbard’s own words, Scientology Ideal Orgs are, in their ultimate expression, intended to become “government centers” and enforce Scientology policies as the law.

    "Somebody some day will say ‘this is illegal.’ By then be sure the orgs [Scientology organizations] say what is legal or not." – L. Ron Hubbard, Hubbard Communications Office Policy Letter, 4 January 1966, "LRH Relationship to Orgs"

    According to Hubbard, Orgs are to say what is legal. The chilling implication one can draw is that the disposal of all persons <2.0 would be fully legal in a Scientology world.

    Church of Scientology members can protest that genocide is not true for them, but until the world sees the Church Scientology publicly repudiate their Master Race ideology of genocide, Fair Game, and disconnection, no one should trust the Church of Scientology.

    Only those people who leave the Church of Scientology and resign from the IAS can be free of the toxic policies that exist in the Church.


    1. L. Ron Hubbard's call to destroy Scientology's enemies, take over governments. the media, and the global financial infrastructure is contained in HCO POLICY LETTER OF 16 FEBRUARY, 1969 Issue IV Confidential — Targets, Defense. See:

    3. In Targets, Defense, Hubbard writes:

    The vital targets on which we must invest most of our time are:

    T1. Depopularizing the enemy to a point of total obliteration.

    T2. Taking over the control or allegiance of the heads or proprietors of all news media.

    T3. Taking over the control or allegiance of key political figures.

    T4. Taking over the control or allegiance of those who monitor international finance and shifting them to a less precarious finance standard.

    Hubbard ordered SP's to be "destroyed" — and "destroyed" is the same word he used in describing the mass drowning of just Venezuelan beggars.


    "… ENEMY — SP Order. Fair game. May be deprived of property or injured by any means by any Scientologist without any discipline of the Scientologist. May be tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed."

    LRH wrote that SP's "may be tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed."

    There is no getting around the fact that Church of Scientology has an active and ongoing policy to destroy its enemies.

  9. Dankoon, Jenni, et al.

    I’m sick and tired of listening to Scientologists gaslight and make excuses for Hubbard and this insane cult.

    Scientology is a suppressive organization, both in its goals to control its members minds and in its goals to control society at large COVERTLY.

    You guys need to take responsibility for the crap that you helped create. Being in RTC while Sea Org members were brainwashed and tortured for the last 30-40 years is NOT a badge of merit, it is an admission of the abject failure of the “Tech” and of those responsible to deliver it.

    Here is a link to Marty’s “The Aims of Scientology: Part One”

    Our war has been forced to become “To take over absolutely the field of mental
    healing on this planet in all forms.” That was not the original purpose. The original purpose was to clear Earth.

    Well done Jeffrey!!

  10. please review the recent behavior of the church of scientology and review these books and explain to me why I shouldn’t believe genocide is probable

    intro to ethics

    “So to live at all in the shadow or employ of a power you must yourself gather and USE enough power to hold your own-without just nattering to the power to ”kill Pete”, in straightforward
    or more suppressive veiled ways to him as these wreck the power that supports yours.
    He doesn’t have to know all the bad news and if he’s a power really he won’t ask all
    the time, ”What are all those dead bodies doing at the door?” And if you are clever,
    you never let it be thought HE killed them-that weakens you and also hurts the power
    source. ”Well, boss, about all those dead bodies, nobody at all will suppose you did it.
    She over there, those pink legs sticking out, didn’t like me.”

    **What are all those dead bodies doing at the door?**

    **never let it be thought HE killed them**

    **those pink legs sticking out, (she) didn’t like me**

    that isn’t particularly genocidal, but it no doubt sociopathic and sets the precedence for the clear genocide option suggested here in science of survival (reposting what was mentioned above in the comments)

    “There are only two answers for the handling of people from 2.0 down on the tone scale, neither one of which has anything to do with reasoning with them or listening to their justification of their acts.

    The first is to raise them on the tone scale by un-enturbulating some of their theta by any one of the three valid processes. The other is to dispose of them quietly and without sorrow.”

    **dispose of quietly and without sorrow**

    “It is not necessary to produce a world of clears in order to have a reasonable
    and worthwhile social order; it is only necessary to delete those individuals who range from 2.0
    down, either by processing them enough to get their tone level above the 2.0 line — a task
    which, indeed, is not very great, since the amount of processing in many cases might be under
    fifty hours, although it might also in others be in excess of two hundred — or simply
    quarantining them from the society. A Venezuelan dictator once decided to stop leprosy. He
    saw that most lepers in his country were also beggars. By the simple expedient of collecting
    and destroying all the beggars in Venezuela an end was put to leprosy in that country.”

    **simple expedient collecting and destroying**

    **and an analogy that stereotypes and degrades beggars and how killing them was a good solution**

    that’s scripture for a church and the public needs to be warned this is their scripture and that they do need to be watched for genocide

    right now there’s not public threat, but if they grew large enough in any area of the world to have real influence you can bet they are very likely to start leaning toward option 2

    dispose of quietly and without sorrow

    kill off those low toned lepers

    Jenni do you ever experience tone 2.0 or below, or will you get there in your final years in this body? because if you do they might just decide you’re a beggar and a leper and they need to destroy you…

  11. I saw this independently of this blog, long ago when I was a teenager and first read these books, independently had these same concerns, he’s suggesting genocide of low toned people, where’s your surprise coming from?

    here’s a question, do you want kids reading these paragraphs?

    dispose of people quietly, deleting beggars from society, as examples of a good solution?

    when I read sos I immediately thought, wow, if there was a town where scientology held sway the low toned people would be goners… i reread it several times actually and dismissed it justifying it by thinking well the rest of the book is mostly about helping people get uptone and I’m sure they’ll never get so desperate they’ll have to start disposing the low toned people so it doesn’t matter

    but the concern lingered in the back of my mind and stacked on top of other concerns finally I decided yeah I don’t stand for this, it isn’t necessary, I can do good things in life without representing a group that condones scripture like this, and if this book is in public libraries it should have some genocide warnings for children and maybe be kept in the section with other genocidal work

    and after intro to ethics i thought wow, is he really suggesting using lethal force to protect your superiors? yes do you think thats an allegory or that he didn’t mean it?

    dehumanization is all over the place, they’re not people they’re just one ones, 1.0s or .5’s , scientologists don’t die they drop bodies, they don’t need them anyway they’re just a hindrance, thetans can just go pick up a new body, they can run more than one actually, and if you want an exterior just shoot them in the head with a .45 chuckle chuckle, r2-45, etc.

    there’s so many degrading references about humans, calls names, assigns numbers, humanoids, homo saps, wogs, raw meat, he clearly had very little concerns for humans or bodies, db’s, just thetans

  12. please, somebody, anybody with a sense of decency, push Jeff off the porch!

  13. This comment calling for violence — “push Jeff off the porch” — is typical of rabid Church of Scientology cultists. Scientology cultists cannot compete in open debate and so they create hate websites and call for violence. The Church of Scientology is a psycho-terrorist Cult.

    By the way “Boris” here is your information for the world to see. I want people to see your e-mail address and IP number because the world needs to know your id:

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.